B.K.PATEL
Ashok Kumar Padhy – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
B.K. PATEL,J.
In this writ petition, the petitioner has made prayer to quash the proceeding in U.V.M.C. No.417 of 2008 and Certificate Case No.26 of 2014, and consequential notices at Annexures-2, 4 series and 6.
2. Petitioner’s case is that on the basis of the claim to be the owner on the strength of Hat Patta alleged to have been granted by the ruler of Kanika Estate, one Rabindra Nath Lenka executed in favour of the petitioner registered sale deed no.5064 dated 24.8.2005 in respect of the land measuring an area of Ac.2.500 pertaining to plot no.321 under Khata No.619 of Mouza Chandrasekharpur recorded in the name of G.A. Department of the State of Orissa. At the time of registration, the petitioner was not aware of the fact that the above said land stands recorded in the name of the Government. In such circumstances, the sale deed executed in favour of the petitioner does not confer title over the land to the petitioner. The petitioner also never claimed title over the land nor possession of the land was delivered to the petitioner. The petitioner being aware that he has not derived any title on the strength of the aforesaid sale deed, never claimed any interes
Government of Andhra Pradesh and others –vrs.- P. Laxmi Devi (Smt): (2008) 4 SCC 720
Whirlpool Corporation -vrs.- Registrar of Trade Mark
A.V. Venkateswaran, Collector of Customs, Bombay v. Ramchand Sobharaj Wadhwani
Calcutta Discount Co.Ltd. v.Income-tax Officer, Companies Distt. I
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.