B.R.SARANGI
Rajanikanta Priyadarshy – Appellant
Versus
Utkal University Represented through its Registrar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Dr. B.R.Sarangi, J.
The petitioner has filed this application seeking to quash the notification of the Utkal University dated 24.11.2010 vide Annexure-9 and subsequent notification dated 20.12.2010 vide Annexure-10 cancelling his result in +3 Final Degree (Regular) Examination, 2010 (2007 Admission Batch) declaring him as „fail?.
2. The short fact of the case in hand is that the petitioner after passing +2 Arts from CHSE, Odisha, Bhubaneswar was admitted to +3 Arts course through distance education under opposite party no.3. On successful completion of the course, the petitioner was declared to have passed the +3 Arts course in the year 2010 vide Annexure-3 with second class honours. Thereafter, the petitioner was admitted to Master in Finance Control (MFC) in BJB Autonomous College, Bhubaneswar under the Utkal University and at the same time he has also registered his name under the IGNOU in Post Graduate course in M.A. in Public Administration. After successfully completing the course of Master in Finance Control in BJB Autonomous College, the petitioner appeared the examination conducted for the purpose by the Utkal University and has also been declared pass and due
A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India (1970) 1 SCR 457 : (1969) 2 SCC 262
Sahara India (Firm) v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central I
Union of India and others v. M/s Anglo Afghan Agencies etc.
Chowgule & Company (Hind) Pvt. Ltd v. Union of India and others
M/s Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd v. The State of Uttar Pradesh and others
Union of India and others v. Godfrey Phillips India Ltd.
Delhi Cloth & General Mills Ltd. v. Union of India and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.