B.P.RAY
U. Harigopal – Appellant
Versus
Republic of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
B.P. Ray, J.
This appeal has been preferred under Sections 374 of Criminal Procedure Code and Section 27 of the Prevention of Corruption Act by the appellant challenging the judgment and order of conviction dated 07.08.2004 passed by the learned Special Judge (C.B.I.), Bhubaneswar sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- (rupees two thousand), in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months for the offence under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act and rigorous imprisonment for two years and pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- (rupees five thousand), in default of such payment, to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year for the offence under Section 13(2) r/w Sec. 13(1)(d) of the said Act and both the substantive sentences were directed to run concurrently.
2. Prosecution case, in short, is that complainant (P.W.2) Ramesh Chandra Sahu, Secretary, Kedar Gouri Khadi Gramodyog Samiti, Bhubaneswar had applied for a loan to Khadi and Village Industries Commission (in short, 'KVIC'), Bhubaneswar, for opening of a jewellery shop by their Samiti. The appellant-accused was the Direc
C.M. Girish Babu v. C.B.I., Cochin, High Court of Kerala
State through Inspector of Police, A.P. v. Narasimhachary
Niranjan Bharati v. State of Orissa 2003 (2) OLR 399
G.V. Nanjundiah v. State (Delhi Administration) AIR 1987 SC 2402
Suraj Mal v. The State of (Delhi Administration)
C.M. Girish Babu v. C.B.I., Cochin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.