SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Ori) 849

A.K.RATH
Deepak Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sandhyarani Giri – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ramakanta Kar.
For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Durga Prasad Jena, Mr. Kamal Ray.

JUDGMENT :

A.K. Rath, J.

This petition challenges the order dated 4.2.2016 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Talcher in C.S No.39 of 2012 whereby and whereunder the learned trial court rejected the application of the petitioner under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC for impleadment.

2. Opposite party no.1 as plaintiff instituted C.S. No. 39 of 2012 in the court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Talcher for mandatory injunction impleading opposite party no.2 as defendant. The petitioner, who is the son of opposite party no.2, instituted C.S. No.129 of 2005 in the same court impleading opposite parties and others for declaration of sale deed dated 20.11.2002 as void, declaration of right, title and interest and possession over the suit property and permanent injunction. The schedule property in both the suits is same. While the matter stood thus, the petitioner filed an application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC in C.S. No.39 of 2012 stating therein that he has filed C.S. No. 129 of 2005 impleading the parties in the suit for a declaration of right, title and interest and possession over the suit land, wherein the validity of the sale deed dated 20.11.2002 has been challenged.






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top