SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Ori) 988

B.R.SARANGI
Prafulla Kumar Khadenga – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India – Respondent


Advocates:
For Petitioner: M/s. A.K. Mishra (Sr. Adv.), J. Sengupta, D.K. Panda, G. Sinha & A. Mishra
For Opp. Parties : M/s. R.K. Rath (Sr. Adv.) & P.V.Balakrishna
.

JUDGMENT

Dr. B.R.SARANGI, J. - The petitioner who was working as a Special Assistant of State Bank of India, Kodala Branch has filed this application to quash the order of punishment dated 25.03.2010 under Annexure-7 passed by opposite party no.4-Assistant General Manager (Admn) & Disciplinary Authority, State Bank of India, Administrative Unit, Berhampur (Gm) imposing penalty of compulsory retirement with superannuation benefits i.e. Pension and/or Provident Fund and Gratuity as would be due otherwise under the Rules or Regulations prevailing at the relevant time and without disqualification from future employment and the order dated 06.07.2010 under Annexure-10 passed by opposite party no.2-Deputy General Manager (O & C-NW)-II, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, Bhubaneswar rejecting his appeal under Annexure-8 by confirming the order passed by the Disciplinary Authority.

2. The short fact of the case in hand is that the petitioner while working as Special Assistant at Surada Branch committed an act of omission and commission which was highly prejudicial and detrimental t


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top