SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Ori) 624

A.K.RATH
Meera Patra – Appellant
Versus
Rekha Pradhan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. P.K. Swain
For the Opp. Parties : Mr. P.V. Balakrishna

JUDGMENT :

A.K. Rath, J.

This petition challenges the order dated 24.12.2014 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Baripada in C.S. No. 467 of 2013, whereby and whereunder learned trial court rejected the application of the plaintiff under Order 6 Rule 17 C.P.C. to delete the name of State Bank of India-defendant no.6 and delete few paragraphs with regard to mortgage of the property in favour of defendant no.6.

2. The petitioner as plaintiff instituted the suit for partition impleading the opposite parties as defendants. It is, inter alia, pleaded that the suit property is the joint family property of defendant nos.1 to 5. Defendant nos.2 and 3 in connivance with the defendant nos.1, 4 and 5 clandestinely mortgaged the property in favour of State Bank of India, defendant no.6. Defendant no.6 filed written statement. While the matter stood thus, plaintiff filed an application purportedly under Order 23 Rule 1 C.P.C. for withdrawal of the suit against defendant no.6. Defendant no.6 filed objection to the same stating therein that the suit property had been mortgaged in favour of the Bank. Since the loanee became a defaulter, the Bank had taken possession of the same under the S




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top