SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Ori) 1164

A.K.RATH
Jadunath Jena – Appellant
Versus
Hiramani Bewa – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Ramakanta Mohanty, Sr. Adv., Mr. K.K. Mohapatra, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. S. Mantry, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

A.K. Rath, J.

This appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned Subordinate, Anandapur in Title Appeal No. 7 of 1982 reversing the judgment of the learned Munsif, Anandapur.

2. Respondent no.1 as plaintiff instituted a suit for declaration that the decree passed in T.M.S No.72 of 1974 and mortgage deed executed in favour of defendant no.8 are illegal and invalid.

3. The following family tree would show the relationship of the parties.

Family Tree

Bira Sa = Tulsi

Sachi

(daughter)

D-5

Gopinath

(son)

Jhumuri

(daughter)

D-6

Mauda

(daughter)

D-7

Parikhit

(son)

Dharani

(son)

D-1

Hiramani

(wife) Plf.

Asamani(wife) (D.2)

Kishore

Son

D-3

Bisaya

(daughter)

D-4

Case of the plaintiff was that Bira Sa was the common ancestor of the parties. After the death of Bira, the suit land was in possession of his three sons. Hi


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top