Key Points: - The judgment holds that eviction on the ground of denial of title by the tenant, if not bona fide, cannot be sustained and that such denial must be properly pleaded and tried with reference to bona fides. (!) (!) (!) - It explains that eviction petitions must be filed before the Controller, and that if denial of title is found not bona fide, the landlord may pursue eviction in civil court under second proviso, allowing unified resolution of disputes to avoid multiplicity of suits. (!) (!) - It establishes that wilful default requires a finding of wilful non-payment of rent; simple non-payment for short periods may not constitute wilful default, and petitions based on wilful default can be dismissed if not established. (!) (!) - It emphasizes the need for proper pleadings, trial on issues framed (e.g., denial of title as an issue must be properly pleaded and tried), and that subsequent evidence cannot by itself create a ground for eviction if not appropriately framed in the eviction petition. (!) (!) (!) - It directs that, to resolve rent disputes, interim and final rent determinations and arrears payments must be addressed in line with proceedings for fair rent, with interim deposits required until finality. (!) (!)

What is the effect of a tenant’s denial of the landlord’s title on eviction under Section 10(2)(vii) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960?

What are the proper proceedings and procedural requirements for eviction petitions under the Act when denial of title is raised?

What are the appropriate remedies and jurisdiction when there is a dispute over rent default versus wilful default and denial of title in eviction petitions?