SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Ori) 494

B.S.CHAUHAN, B.N.MAHAPATRA
MANORANJAN PARIDA – Appellant
Versus
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

B.S. Chauhan, C.J. - This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the Judgment and order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack (hereinafter called 'the DRT) passing an ex parte Judgment and Order Dated 18.08.2005 in O.A. No. 54 of 2001 against the present Petitioner and rejecting his applications for recalling the ex parte order and condonation of delay vide Judgment and Order Dated 28.02.2008 in M.A. Nos. 27 and 28 of 2008.

2. The facts and circumstances giving rise to this case are that the Petitioner stood guarantor (though stated before this Court first time that his signatures had been forged by the borrower) and as loanee did not make the payment, the Opposite Party-Bank i.e. Union Bank of India initiated the proceedings for recovery. Petitioner claims that he had not been served any notice nor aware of the proceedings and finally ex parte Judgment and order had been passed against him on 18.08.2005. Subsequent thereto, when the notice was published on 8.8.2007 in the newspaper The Sambad' a friend of the Petitioner informed him about the notice and proceeding. Thus, he immediately filed an application i.e. M.A. No. 27 of 2008 in O.A. No. 54 of 2001











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top