SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Ori) 294

S.C.MOHAPATRA, P.C.MISRA
N. D. SAMANT (AFTER HIM) SATYABHAMA DEBI – Appellant
Versus
KUMARI JAYASHREE ROY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L.N. Swamy, for the Appellant; R.K. Mohapatra, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT :

S.C. Mohapatra, J. - This is an appeal by the Defendant u/s 299 of the Indian Succussion Act. 1925 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').

2. Letter of administration granted in respect of the Will (Est. 10) dated 12-2.1972 written in Telugu language in favour of the Plaintiff by her father Kamalnath Roy is assailed in the present appeal which is being continued by the legal representatives of the original Appellant who died during pendency of the appeal.

3. Trial court accepted the English translation of the Will as follows;

Maharaja Kumar Shri Kamalnath Roy Jeypore Dt. 12-2-72. The money which I have now with me by this dated 12-2-1972 is Rs. 4,303.63 p. Some amount is yet to come from Srikakulam. All these are to be given to my daughter Jayashree. This is written out of my free Will. I have written this in my own hand. As I am suffering from Paralysis, I am not able to write more. There are no heirs. My daughter is the absolute owner. This is my free Will. It shall thus be determined. Kamalnath Roy, 12-2-72.

This translation has not been disputed before us.

4. Kamalnath is the son of Late Vikram Dev, the intermediary of Jeypore Estate. He was residing in the palace at Jeypo














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top