SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Ori) 907

A.K.GOEL, A.K.RATH
LAXMIKANTA KAR – Appellant
Versus
SURENDRA PAUL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.S. Nandy, for the Appellant;

JUDGMENT :

Dr. A.K. Rath, J. - Challenging, inter alia, the order dated 11.7.2013 passed by the learned Single Judge, the aforementioned appeal has been filed. By the said order, the learned Single Judge confirmed the order dated 16.03.2013 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jaleswar in C.S. No. 83 of 2005 allowing the application under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of the CPC (in short, "the CPC"). The appellant as plaintiff laid a suit being C.S. No. 83 of 2005 in the court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jaleswar for declaration of right, title and interest in respect of suit schedule plot, for a declaration that the major settlement R.O.R. as illegal and for permanent injunction. In the said suit, the villagers filed an application for impletion of parties. The case of the villagers is that they are using the suit schedule property since long and the goddess temple is situated towards the southern side of the suit land. Towards the northern side, there is a main road from Jaleswar to Chandaneswar. They have also asserted that they have a right on the way to the temple and, as such, they are necessary parties to the lis. The said application having been allowed,











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top