SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Ori) 450

D.P.MOHAPATRA, ARIJIT PASAYAT
MURALI PADHI ALIAS MURALIDHAR PADHI – Appellant
Versus
TAHASILDAR – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Order No. 16 dated 19-1-1990:

1. Being unsuccessful before the statutory forums the Petitioner has approached this Court for redress of his grievance regarding his eviction from Ac 0.01 cent of land in survey plot No. 513 of village Badagada. The prayer in the writ application is to quash the order dated 11-8-1987 passed by the opposite party No. 1, Tahasildar, Surada (Annexure-4) directing his eviction from the land in question and the orders passed by the opposite party No. 2 Sub-divisional Officer, Bhanjanagar (Annexure-5), the opposite party No. 3, Addl. District Magistrate, Ganjam (Annexure-6) and the Revenue Divisional Commissioner, Southern Division, Berhampur, (Annexure-8) confirming the said order of eviction.

2. Shorn of unnecessary details, the facts relevant for the present purpose may be stated thus. The Petitioner purchased the case land which was recorded as Gramakanthl Parambok land in the Record-of-Rights from saiba Behera aliasSubash Chandra Behera and Rangadhar Behera by a registered sale deed dated 18-1-1984; the forefathers of the vendors of the Petitioner had got this land from the Raja Saheb of Badagada, the Petitioner's residential house stands on th







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top