IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK
S. Muralidhar, R.K. Pattanaik, JJ.
M/s. M.g. Mohanty & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
State Of Odisha & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(C) Nos. 3523, 5491 & 5494 of 2022 and W.P.(C) Nos. 28644 & 30554 of 2021
Decided On : 08-04-2022
COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT, 2015 - ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 - JURISDICTION - COMMERCIAL DISPUTES - INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES - CONFLICT OF LAWS - APPLICABILITY OF PROVISIONS - POWERS OF STATE GOVERNMENT - CONSTITUTION OF COMMERCIAL COURTS - TRANSFER OF CASES - VALIDITY OF NOTIFICATION - SCOPE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW.
Fact of the Case:
Five writ petitions were filed challenging the notification issued by the State Government establishing the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division) for exercising jurisdiction and powers under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 (CC Act). The petitions also questioned the transfer of applications under Sections 9, 14, 34, and so on of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (A&C Act) to the Commercial Court.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that the provisions of the CC Act prevail over the provisions of the A&C Act in relation to the jurisdiction and powers of Commercial Courts to deal with commercial disputes, including arbitral disputes. The Court found that the State Government had the power to constitute Commercial Courts and transfer cases to such Courts under the CC Act. The Court also upheld the validity of the notification issued by the State Government establishing the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division) as a Commercial Court.
Issues: 1. Whether the provisions of the CC Act prevail over the provisions of the A&C Act in relation to the jurisdiction and powers of Commercial Courts to deal with commercial disputes, including arbitral disputes? 2. Whether the State Government has the power to constitute Commercial Courts and transfer cases to such Courts under the CC Act? 3. Whether the notification issued by the State Government establishing the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division) as a Commercial Court is valid?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The CC Act is a later enactment than the A&C Act and specifically deals with the establishment of Commercial Courts and the transfer of commercial disputes to such Courts. 2. The provisions of the CC Act are more specific and detailed in relation to the jurisdiction and powers of Commercial Courts than the provisions of the A&C Act. 3. The objective of both the CC Act and the A&C Act is to provide for the speedy resolution of commercial disputes. 4. The provisions of the CC Act are not inconsistent with the provisions of the A&C Act and can be harmoniously construed to give effect to the objectives of both enactments. 5. The State Government has the power to constitute Commercial Courts and transfer cases to such Courts under the CC Act. 6. The notification issued by the State Government establishing the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division) as a Commercial Court is valid.
Final Decision: The Court dismissed all five writ petitions, holding that the provisions of the CC Act prevail over the provisions of the A&C Act in relation to the jurisdiction and powers of Commercial Courts to deal with commercial disputes, including arbitral disputes. The Court also upheld the validity of the notification issued by the State Government establishing the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division) as a Commercial Court.
JUDGMENT
Dr. S. Muralidhar, CJ. - These five writ petitions raise interesting questions of law concerning the interpretation as well as interplay of the provisions of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 (CC Act) with the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (A&C Act). These petitions also question a Notification dated 13th November 2020, issued by the State of Odisha through its Principal Secretary, Law Department in establishing the Court of the Civil Judge (Senior Division) for the purposes of exercising jurisdiction and powers under the CC Act.
2. The question posed for consideration by this Court is whether for the purposes of the dealing with applications under Sections 9, 14, 34 and so on of the A&C Act jurisdiction can be conferred on a judicial officer subordinate to the rank of a District Judge, i.e., the Principal Civil Judge in the district notwithstanding Section 2 (1) (e) of the A&C Act? An incidental question is whether the power exercised by the State Government under Section 3(3) read with Section 10(3) and 15(2) of the CC Act can override Section 42 of the A&C Act?
Facts in W.P. (C) Nos. 3523, 5491 and 5493 of 2022
3. Three of the five writ petitions are by M/s. M.G. Mohanty, a registered partnership firm (Petitioner No.1) and its managing partner Mr. Rajiv Lochan Mohanty (Petitioner No.2). The background facts in these three petitions are that due to the disputes between the partners of the firm i.e. Petitioner No.2 and proforma Opposite Party Nos.4 to 8, applications under Section 9 were filed before the District & Sessions Judge (D&SJ), Bhubaneswar. These were the Arbitration Petition Nos.56, 57 and 58 of 2020. The learned D&SJ admitted Arbitration Petition No.56 of 2020 by an order dated 12th November, 2020 and on 17th November, 2020 passed an interim order in favour of the Petitioners. He issued notice in the remaining two petitions on 2nd December, 2020.
4. Meanwhile, on 13th November 2020, the impugned notification was issued by the Law Department of the State Government in consultation with the High Court establishing the Court of the Civil Judge (Senior Division) and conferring the powers and jurisdiction of the Commercial Courts under the CC Act on such Court. Following this, on 7th July 2021, the learned D&SJ transferred Arbitration Petitions Nos.56, 57 and 58 of 2020 to the Court of the Senior Civil Judge (Commercial Court), Bhubaneswar.
5. It is further stated that an application was filed before the learned D&SJ, challenging the jurisdiction of the Commercial Court in adjudicating the matter under the A&C Act particularly, since the Presiding Officer of the Commercial Court is subordinate to the rank of a District Judge and that hearing of the application under Section 9 of the A&C Act by the Senior Civil Judge (Commercial Court) would be against the spirit of the A&C Act in terms of the recent definition of the expression, "Principal Civil Court", in the A&C Act. By an order dated 25th October 2021, the learned D&SJ rejected that application inter alia on the ground that the order dated 7th July 2021, passed by the D&SJ transferring the matter to the Senior Civil Judge (Commercial Court) was an order under Section 15 of the A&C Act, and that order had not been challenged before a higher forum.
6. In the present petitions, a challenge has been raised not only to the notification dated 13th November, 2020 but also the order dated 7th July, 2021 passed by the learned D&SJ transferring the cases pending before him to the Court of the Senior Civil Judge (Commercial Court) as well as the above order dated 25th October, 2021. A direction is sought for the establishment of the Commercial Court by conferring the power on the Presiding Officer in the cadre of the District Judge, not subordinate to the rank of the District Judge.
7. In the aforementioned three petitions by M/s. M.G. Mohanty
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.