B.R.SARANGI, SAVITRI RATHO
Raheman Mahammed – Appellant
Versus
State Of Orissa – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. B.R. Sarangi, J. - The petitioner, by means of this writ petition, seeks to quash the order of punishment dated 08.12.2006 passed by the disciplinary authority under Annexure-10; the order dated 12.12.2008 passed by the appellate authority under Annexure-11; and the consequential order dated 28.09.2016 passed in O.A. No. 387 (C) of 2009 under Annexure-12, by which the Orissa Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack, while dismissing the Original Application, has affirmed the order passed by the appellate authority by holding that Rule-29 of the OCS (CC&A) Rules, 1962 does not provide that such order is to be an elaborate and a speaking one.
2. The factual matrix of the case, in brief, is that the petitioner, while working as Junior Clerk in the office of the Sub-Treasury Officer, Athagarh, passed two GPF bills bearing Nos. 84 and 85 of 2003-04 of SDMO, Athagarh. Subsequently, he also passed and disbursed two other bills bearing No. 94 and 95/2003-04 of the said SDMO. Thereafter, the excess amount, which had been disbursed due to the above, were deposited vide challan No. 5 dated 03.07.2004. The SDMO, Athagarh, vide letter No. 803 dated 05.07.2004, intimated the A
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.