SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ori) 303

JASWANT SINGH, S.K.PANIGRAHI
Ashirbad Pattnaik – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sambit Samal, Advocate, for the Appellant; None, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

J. Singh, J. - The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners purportedly in the nature of a Public Interest Litigation seeking reliefs against the State and some of the private opposite parties alleging some illegal mining and transportation of minerals etc. resulting in loss of public exchequer.

2. Without going into the merits of the matter, we feel the procedural improprieties resorted to by the petitioners herein and their counsel persuade us to believe that there is something much more than which meets the eye.

3. We find from the perusal of the file attached herewith that the same advocate had filed a previous writ petition in the form of Public Interest Litigation being W.P. (C) 16719 of 2020 with different set of petitioners (11 in number) with similar content and seeking identical relief sought herein. We find further from the perusal of the file of the earlier similar Public Interest Litigation-W.P.(C) No.16719 of 2020 attached herewith that the allegation/grievance raised in both the petitions are similar in substance. In fact, it is noticed that the advocate in both the petitions is the same i.e. one Mr. Sambit Samal. What has changed is that the ear

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top