P.PATNAIK
Tapan Garnaik @ Tapan Kumar Garnaik – Appellant
Versus
State Of Orissa – Respondent
JUDGMENT
P.Patnaik, J. - The above mentioned three separate appeals have been preferred by the respective appellants challenging the common judgment dated 24.04.2018 passed by the learned Special Judge (Vigilance), Sundargarh in CTR Case No.20 of 2007 convicting and sentencing each of the above named appellants and to undergo R.I. for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) in default of payment of fine to undergo a further period of rigorous imprisonment for three months under each of the offences under Section 120-B, 468/120-B, 471/120-B and 420/120-B of the Indian Penal Code (in short the 'I.P.C.')
Further the appellants in CRLA Nos.363 of 2018 and 390 of 2018 being the public servant were also sentenced to undergo R.I. for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- in default on payment of fine amount to undergo further period of R.I. for three months on each of the offences under Section 477-A, I.P.C. and under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
All the above substantive sentences awarded to each of the convicts were directed to run concurrently with the benefit of set off.
2. The gravamen of the prosecuti
Baikunthanath Mohanty-vrs.-State of Orissa
Jaikrishnadas M.Desai & another-vrs.-State of Bombay
Megha Singh-vrs.-State of Haryana
Rajiv Kumar-vrs.-State of U.P. & another
State of Punjab-vrs.Jagir Singh, Baljit Singh and Karam Singh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.