SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ori) 354

S.K.PANIGRAHI
Pama @ Pramod Dehury – Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Amitav Tripathy, Advocate, M. Pagal, Advocate, K.C. Sahoo, Advocate, A.K. Behera, Advocate, S.S. Kanungo, Advocate

JUDGMENT

S.K. Panigrahi, J. - "Abuse is never contained to a present moment, it lingers across a person's lifetime and has pervasive long-term ramifications" penned down by the author Lorraine Nilon who has explored plight of child sexual abuse as a matter of great concern, articulates the predicament of the matter-at-hand. A crime of such heinous intent and grave nature needs to be punished with a stringent law that comprehends the intricacies of the situation. Plethora of judgments by the Apex Court has succinctly held that the POCSO Act has been framed to protect the children from the sexual assault, harassment and exploitation, and to secure the best interest of the child. The Act recognizes the necessity of the right to privacy and confidentiality of a child to be protected and respected by every person by all means and through all stages of a judicial process involving the child.

2. Blapl No.5656 of 2020 and BLAPL No.5888 of 2020 being similar in facts, nature of offence committed and the involvement of the same person, hence both are heard analogously and taken up together for disposal by this common judgment.

3. The petitioner has filed the instant application under Section 43

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top