SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ori) 409

B.P.ROUTRAY
Susil Kumar Pattnaik – Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr.Gautam Mishra, Sr.Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr.Niranjan Moharana, ; A.S.C .(Vigilance), for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

B.P. Routray, J. - The petitioner has challenged the order dated 13.01.2020 of the learned Special Judge, Vigilance, Berhampur passed in G.R.No.28 of 2013(V), wherein his prayer for discharge from the offences under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(c)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act (in short 'P.C.Act') and Sections 409/471/120-B of the Indian Penal Code (in short 'I.P.C.') has been rejected.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that he is presently working as A.B.D.O. of Dharakote Block in the district of Ganjam. He was remained Incharge Executive Officer of Chikiti N.A.C. from 1.3.2008 to 6.8.2009. It is alleged that during the said period of his incumbency in Chikiti N.A.C., he, by committing irregularity in tender process issued the work order to a nonexistent farm run by the co-accused-Priyabrata Biswal to procure the Cesspool Emptier resulting wrongful loss to the public fund and unlawful pecuniary advantage to the accused persons. Concerning manipulation of tender papers and use of forged document in the transaction, the chargsheet was filed by Vigilance Police in Berhampur Vigilance P.S.Case No.28 dated 30.9.2013 for the aforestated offences. Consequently

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top