JUDGMENT :

Sashikanta Mishra, J.

Aggrieved by the rejection of his claim for regularization of service by the Additional Chief Secretary to Government in Finance Department (Opposite Party No. 1), the Petitioner has preferred the instant application seeking the following relief:

“Under the circumstances, it is humbly prayed therefore that the Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash the impugned order dated 4.10.2018 passed by the Opposite Party No.1 under Annexure-25 ;

And further be pleased to direct the Opposite Parties to regularize the service of the Petitioner as has been done in the case of the Anadi Charan Tripathy and Bhaskar Ch. Roul, and keeping view the letter dated 21.6.2011 under Annexure-15 with all consequential service benefits;

Or pass any other order/orders as this Hon’ble Court may think fit and proper.”

2. The facts of the case, relevant only for deciding the present application are as follows:

Pursuant to instruction issued by the Director of Treasuries and Inspection, Orissa (Opposite Party No.2) by letter dated 4.8.2009, the Treasury Officer of Jajpur had appointed the Petitioner and another person as Peons against the contractual posts created by the Gover