SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ori) 556

S. MURALIDHAR, M. S. RAMAN
Sushree Automotives – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Samvit Mohanty, Advocate, S.S. Mohanty, Advocate, Jaydeep Pal, Advocate, Pravakar Behera, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. These appeals are directed against a judgment dated 18th May 2017 passed by the learned Single Judge in a batch of writ petitions rejecting the challenge made therein to the validity of a circular dated 29th March, 2016 issued by the Transport Commissioner-cum-Chairman, State Transport Authority (STA), whereby all the Regional Transport Officer (RTOs) were directed to collect tax from the dealers/manufacturers of motor vehicles on the basis of total number of vehicles possessed and registered during the entire year by the dealer. The learned Single Judge also negatived the challenge to the consequential demand notices issued by the various RTOs.

2. The learned Single Judge in the impugned judgment, which was common to the batch of writ petitions, chose to consider W.P.(C) No.5648 of 2017 by the Odisha Automobiles Dealers Association (OADA) as the lead petition. It was noted by the learned Single Judge, as far as the said petition was concerned, that OADA was a trust, the members of which were engaged in a business of hypothecation, leasing or hire-purchase of motor ve

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top