SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ori) 507

ARINDAM SINHA
Ramakanta Nayak – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Susanta Kumar Mishra, Advocate, Suman Patnayak, Advocate, Gautam Mishra, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Arindam Sinha, J. - Mr. Mishra, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, impugned is final order dated 13th November, 2019 made by the State Level Scrutiny Committee in Fake Caste Certificate (FCC) Case no.268 of 2010. By it the committee concluded that petitioner is Pano by caste and Christian by religion, therefore, covered under SEBC list of Odisha. By impugned order, inter alia cancellation and confiscation of petitioner's SC caste certificate was directed. He draws attention to annexure-2 in his client's rejoinder. Is carries order sheet of the Tahsildar. He refers to orders dated 6th August, 1982, 25th November, 1982 and 30th November, 1982 relating to issuance of the caste certificate to his client. He demonstrates from the orders that there was enquiry made by the Tahsildar, who had proceeded to Mahagudi and enquired into the matter from Bhidu Baliarsingh, Kopisa Sunamajhi and others of the village. He also draws attention, inter alia, to record in order dated 25th November, 1982, where the Tahsildar says that the Christian preacher of the village also stated that he (petitioner) and his family members are not Christians and they observe all rit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top