SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ori) 595

JASWANT SINGH, M. S. SAHOO
Manoj Kumar Sahu – Appellant
Versus
Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Karlamunda Branch, Dist Kalahandi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S.K. Rath, Advocate, M.M. Swain, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. The Petitioner No.1 is a defaulting borrower of a loan facility availed for a sum of Rs.7 lakhs from State Bank of India, Karlamunda Branch, Dist-Kalahandi on 19.08.2015. Due to non-deposit of installments, the loan account was classified as NPA on 28.05.2018. The Bank then issued a demand notice dated 26.08.2021 under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 recalling the outstanding liability of Rs.9,75,318/-. The Petitioner No.1 is stated to have filed a representation dated 17.09.2021 (Annexure-2) to the aforesaid notice requesting for restructure the payment of the loan installments.

2. By filing the present Writ Petition, a challenge has been laid to the aforesaid demand notice. However, keeping in view the scheme of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, a challenge to the same is not maintainable at this stage.

3. At the time of argument, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for permission to withdraw the Writ Petition to enable his client to pursue his remedy before the Bank.

A Memo to that effect has been filed in the Court today.

4. In view of the Memo filed, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top