SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ori) 602

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S. Muralidhar, M. S. Raman, JJ.
M/s. Shivam Agro – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
STREV No. 32 of 2015
Decided On : 12-12-2022

Advocates appeared:
R.P. Kar, Advocate, S.K. Pradhan, Advocate

The right of the Assessee to apply for a refund of any excess amount paid in accordance with the law.

Headnote:

Entry Tax - Refund of Excess Amount - The court clarified the right of the Assessee to apply for a refund of any excess amount paid in accordance with the law, and ruled in favor of the Assessee regarding the liability under the Orissa Entry Tax Act.

Fact of the Case:

The court modified the order to clarify the Assessee's right to apply for a refund of any excess amount paid and set aside the impugned order of the Tribunal upholding the liability under the Orissa Entry Tax Act.

Finding of the Court:

The court found in favor of the Assessee, ruling that the question regarding the liability under the Orissa Entry Tax Act was answered in the negative, in favor of the Petitioner-Assessee and against the Department.

Issues: The issue was whether 'Chokad' is exigible to Entry tax as per Entry 66 of the Part I of the Schedule appended to the Orissa Entry Tax Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the judgment in STREV No.31 of 2011 (State of Odisha v. M/s. Geetashree Industries), which answered the question in favor of the Assessee.

Final Decision: The revision petition was disposed of in favor of the Assessee, and the impugned order of the Tribunal upholding the liability under the Orissa Entry Tax Act was set aside.

JUDGMENT

1. On being mentioned, the matter is taken up today.

2. Perused the memo filed today in Court. The Court clarifies that after para 4 of the order dated 7th December, 2022; the following para will be added as para 5 and the existing para 5 will be renumbered as para 6:

    '5. It will be open to the Assessee now to apply for refund of any excess amount paid by it in accordance with law.'

3. Accordingly, the order dated 7th December, 2022 is modified as under:

    '1. Admit.

    2. The following question is framed for consideration by this Court:

    'Whether 'Chokad' is exigible to Entry tax as per Entry 66 of the Part I of the Schedule appended to the Orissa Entry Tax Act ?

    3. The above question now stands answered in favour of the Assessee by virtue of the judgment dated 2nd August, 2022 in STREV No.31 of 2011 (State of Odisha v. M/s. Geetashree Industries). Accordingly, the said question is answered in the negative i.e. in favour of the Petitioner-Assessee and against the Department.

    4. As a result, the impugned order of the Tribunal upholding the liability under the OET Act against the present Petitioner is hereby set aside. The consequential imposition of penalty by the Tribunal under Section 9C (5) of the OET Act is also hereby set aside.

    5. It will be open to the Assessee now to apply for refund of any excess amount paid by it in accordance with law.'

    6. The revision petition is disposed of in the above terms. An urgent certified copy of this order be issued as per rules.' 

4. The order dated 7th December, 2022 is modified to the extent indicated above. 

5. Remove the already uploaded order dated 7th December, 2022 from the website and corrected order be uploaded.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top