SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ori) 539

S. MURALIDHAR
Anil Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State (government of India), Represented By Inspector of Mines, Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S. Mohanty, Advocate, Nikhil Pratap, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Dr. S. Muralidhar, CJ. - The five Petitioners, who all hold the managerial positions in the Mahanadi Coalfields Limited (MCL), have filed this petition seeking the quashing of the complaint case i.e. 2(c) C. C. No.9 of 2014 in the Court of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, (SDJM) Sundargarh as well as the order dated 22nd September, 2015 passed by the said SDJM taking cognizance of the offences under Sections 73, 72 A, 72-C(1)(a) of Mines Act, 1852 against the Petitioners.

2. The above case was registered on a complaint by the Inspector of Mines appointed under Section 5 of the Mines Act, 1952 arising from a fatal accident at the Kulda OC Mine, village Balinga, PS Hemgir, District Sundergarh in which, while salvaging remnant coal from the toe of an external overburden dump of an opencast coal mine, 13 persons died due to serious bodily injuries. The complaint listed out numerous violations that were observed when the complainant made an inspection and inquiry on 11th, 12th and 13th September, 2013 into the causes and circumstances that led to the said accident.

3. Inter alia, it is stated that the five Petitioners herein were at the relevant time entrusted with the oversigh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top