SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ori) 391

K. R. MOHAPATRA
Karunakar Panda – Appellant
Versus
Soumya Manjari Padhi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Jayakrishna Mohapatra, Advocate

JUDGMENT

 K.R. Mohapatra. - This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.

2. Petitioner in this writ petition seeks to assail the order dated 30th September, 2022 (Annexure-4) passed by learned Judge, Family Court, Balasore in Execution Case No.13 of 2021, whereby it directed to issue warrant of arrest against the JDr. in exercise of power under Order XXI Rule 38 CPC.

3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the Petitioner that in view of provision under Section 18 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, the judgment / order of the Family Court shall be executed like a decree of the Civil Court. Thus, the provision of Order XXI CPC is applicable to the case at hand. Learned Family Court did not at all follow the procedure laid down therein. It is his contention that Khaira Police Station could not have been directed to execute the warrant of arrest as the Family Court is exercising power under Order XXI Rule 38 CPC.

    3.1 Referring to Form-13 to Appendix-E of CPC, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that warrant of arrest should have been issued to the bailiff of the Court and not to Khaira Police Station. As such, the order dated 30th September, 2022 is bad for not following of due proce

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top