IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.SOMARAJAN, J.
Anilkumar, S/o. Sasidharan – Appellant
Versus
Divya – Respondent
OP(C) No. 2422 of 2022
Decided on : 15-06-2023
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Rule 37 and 38 of Order XXI - Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 227 - Warrant of arrest - Powers of Court to enforce execution – Whether it is permissible to take coercive steps under Rule 37 and 38 of Order XXI C.P.C. by issuing warrant of arrest against judgment-debtor for his detention in civil prison, when his property is under attachment either at trial stage or at execution stage - In that stage or during pendency of procedure under clause (b) for sale of movable or immovable property, no warrant of arrest against judgment-debtor can be issued (Para 3).
Finding of the court :
Immovable property belonged to judgment-debtor is under attachment and without proceeding against said property under clause (b) of Section 51 C.P.C. for its sale, coercive steps under clause (c) was initiated for the arrest and detention of judgment-debtor and consequently a warrant was issued and in turn it was executed - The judgment-debtor was arrested and produced before court and was released on bond simply on reason that no subsistence allowance was deposited by decree holder - The entire proceedings initiated under clause (c) of Section 51 C.P.C. hence is vitiated and liable to be rectified by exercising the extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of Constitution.
Result: O.P.(C) will stand allowed
JUDGMENT :
The execution court instead of proceeding against the property, which is under attachment, initiated coercive steps against the judgment-debtor by issuing warrant of arrest under Rule 38 of Order XXI C.P.C.. Consequently, the judgment-debtor was arrested and produced before the court and subsequently released on bond due to non-payment of subsistence allowance. The principal question came up for consideration is, whether it is permissible to take coercive steps under Rule 37 and 38 of Order XXI C.P.C. by issuing warrant of arrest against the judgment-debtor for his detention in civil prison, when his property is under attachment either at the trial stage or at the execution stage ? Can the court issue warrant of arrest at the execution stage to procure the presence of judgment-debtor in execution and under what circumstances such coercive steps can be initiated ?
2. At the execution of money decree, a warrant of arrest can be issued under Rule 38 of Order XXI C.P.C. only when it is found that it is not possible to recover the decree amount or any part thereof by resorting to other methods of execution under Order XXI C.P.C.. The measures/methods of execution which can be adopted in execution of a decree should always be in accordance with the mandate under Section 51 C.P.C. which was carefully worded and drafted by giving first option for sale of movable or immovable property and second option probably, the last option in a money decree by arrest and detention, which reads as follows:
Subject to such conditions and limitations as may be prescribed the Court may, on the application of the decree-holder, order execution of the decree-
(a) by delivery of any property specifically decreed ;
(b) by attachment and sale or by sale without attachment of any property ;
(c) by arrest and detention in prison for such period not exceeding the period specified in Section 58, where arrest and detention is permissible under that Section;
(d) by appointing a receiver ; or
(e) in such other manner as the nature of the relief granted may require :
Provided that, where the decree is for the payment of money, execution by detention in prison shall not be ordered unless, after giving the judgment-debtor an opportunity of showing cause why he should not be committed to prison, the Court for reasons recorded in writing, is satisfied-
(a) that the judgment-debtor, with the object or effect of obstructing or delaying the execution of the decree,-
(i) is likely to abscond or leave the local limits of the jurisdiction of the Court, or
(ii) has, after the institution of the suit in which the decree was passed, dishonestly transferred concealed, or removed any part of his property, or committed any other act of bad faith in relation to his property, or
(b) that the judgment-debtor has, or has had since the date of the decree, the means to pay the amount of the decree or some substantial part thereof and refuses or neglects or has refused or neglected to pay the same, or
(c) that the decree is for a sum for which the judgment-debtor was bound in fiduciary capacity to account.
Explanation: In the calculation of the means of the judgment-debtor for the purposes of clause (b), there shall be left out of account any property which, by or under any law or custom having the force of law for the time being in force, is exempt from attachment in execution of the decree.” (emphasis supplied)
3. The entire scheme of Section 51 C.P.C. clearly postulates the procedure to be taken one after another in execution of a decree. The clause (b) to Section 51 C.P.C. specifies the procedure to be applied in execution of a decree for payment of money by the sale of property either with attachment or without attachment. The subsequent provision, clause (c) deals with yet another method of execution by arrest and detention of judgment- debtor. It was included as a succeeding provision just after the normal method of execution of a money decre
Jolly George Varghese and Another v. The Bank of Cochin (1980) 2 SCC 360
Mandate of issuance of notice and doctrine of 'no means' and 'lack of bonafides' though relevant in determination of issue under Rule 37 of Order XXI C.P.C. r/w proviso attached to Section 51 C.P.C.,....
Order XXI Rule 40 provides that when the judgment-debtor appears on notice issued under Rule 37, or is brought before Court after being arrested.
The court established that the execution of a decree for payment of money must prioritize the sale of the judgment debtor's property before resorting to arrest and detention, and that any order for a....
Arrest warrants against judgment debtors cannot be issued without exhausting property execution options as mandated by CPC; reasoned orders are essential in judicial decisions.
The scope of “utmost good faith” and absence of “bad intention” and “malafides” on the part of the judgment debtor would acquire relevance at this juncture and it is the cardinal ingredient that make....
Arrest of a judgment-debtor in civil proceedings requires strict adherence to procedural safeguards and evidence of willful neglect to pay.
Conditional arrest warrants require compliance with Section 51 CPC, necessitating judicial satisfaction on the judgment-debtor's means and intentions before execution.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.