Back
S. MURALIDHAR, C. R. DASH
Pradyumnasahu – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. S. Muralidhar, CJ. - This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 11th December, 2013 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Jharsuguda in S.T. No.11/10/11 of 2012-13 convicting the Appellant for the offence punishable under Section 302 and 498-A IPC and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) for life and pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default to undergo RI for one year for the offence under Section 302 IPC and to RI for two years for the offence under Section 498-A IPC.
2. The case of the prosecution was that the Appellant was working as Labourer under a contractor of Colliery. He was continuously quarreling with his wife and assaulting her on trivial matters. As per the FIR lodged by Basudev Jadav (PW 9) on 22nd July, 2011 at about 8 a.m., he went to a nearby shop to purchase gutkha and learned that the accused had assaulted his wife (deceased) in the previous night and again in the morning of 22nd July, 2011 by pressing her neck. The deceased became unconscious. Hearing about this PW 9 went to the house of the Appellant and found the deceased lying unconscious on the bed. The female neighbours of the Appellant were massagin
The judgment emphasizes the principles of circumstantial evidence and the importance of establishing a complete chain of evidence consistent only with the guilt of the accused.
Dowry Death - Conviction upheld - Death of the deceased took place in the dwelling house of the accused.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of circumstantial evidence in criminal cases and the need for a complete chain of evidence to establish guilt beyond reasonable dou....
The burden of proof on the accused under Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act and the reliance on medical and circumstantial evidence to establish guilt.
The medical evidence and burden of proof under Section 106 of the Evidence Act are crucial in establishing guilt in cases of circumstantial evidence.
In criminal cases based on circumstantial evidence, it is imperative that the prosecution establishes a clear chain of circumstances that unambiguously points to the guilt of the accused, without alt....
The prosecution must conclusively establish guilt through circumstantial evidence, including motive and cause of death, in cases based on circumstantial evidence.
In a case based on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must prove a complete chain of circumstances that is consistent only with the hypothesis of the guilt of the accused and excludes every oth....
The conviction for murder upheld, highlighting that circumstantial evidence and established patterns of cruelty can substantiate claims beyond reasonable doubt.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
