S. MURALIDHAR, C. R. DASH
Balku Oram – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. S. Muralidhar, CJ. - This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 3rd May, 2002 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Rourkela in Sessions Trial No.39/246 of 1998 convicting the present Appellant for the offence punishable under Sections 302 read with 2. By the impugned judgment, apart from the present Appellant, the trial Court also convicted Udai Oram (Accused No.1), who had also filed the present appeal jointly with the present Appellant. However, the Court was informed at the hearing on 11th August, 2022 that Udai Oram had expired in 2016 itself and, therefore, the appeal by him was dismissed as having abated leaving only the present Appellant-Balku Oram in the fray.
3. The case of the prosecution is that on 17th February, 1998 at around 5 pm, the youngest daughter of Manobodha Naik of village Gundibali Luhakera, Police Station (P.S.) Sector-15, Rourkela in District Sundergarh died. The family members of Manobodha Naik claimed that she died on account of witchcraft practice by the deceased Puni Naik. The further case of the prosecution is that both the accused came to the house of Puni Naik, dragged her from her house and took her near the house
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.