S. MURALIDHAR, C. R. DASH
Mama @ Bidyut Prava Khuntia – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. S. Muralidhar, CJ. - The present batch of cases raises an interesting question of law concerning the power of a Judicial Magistrate to take cognizance of an offence essentially and exclusively triable by the court of sessions vis-a-vis an accused person who has not been charge sheeted.
2. The reference to the present Division Bench of two Judges is pursuant to an order dated 9th July 2004 passed by learned Single Judge of this Court in CRLMC No.2817 of 2003 (Mama @ Bidyut Prava Khuntia v. State of Orissa (2004) 29 OCR 329. In the said order, it was noted by the learned Single Judge of this Court that although the earlier judgments of the Supreme Court of India in Raj Kishore Prasad v. State of Bihar AIR 1996 SC 1931, Ranjit Singh v. State of Punjab (1998) 7 SCC 149 and Kishori Singh v. State of Bihar (2000)19 OCR (SC) 647 had held that when an offence exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions is alleged to have been committed and the matter is investigated, the Magistrate has to go by the person named in the charge sheet and cannot add or subtract to that list since he has no jurisdiction in that respect, a contrary view was taken by the Supreme Court in M/s. SWIL Ltd
Dharam Pal v. State of Haryana (2004) 13 SCC 9
Dharam Pal v. State of Haryana (2014) 3 SCC 306
Jile Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2012) 3 SCC 383
Kishori Singh v. State of Bihar (2004) 13 SCC 11
Kishun Singh v. State of Bihar (1993) 2 SCC 16
M/s. SWIL Ltd. v. State of Delhi AIR 2001 SC 2747
Nahar Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) 5 SCC 295
Raj Kishore Prasad v. State of Bihar (1996) 4 SCC 495
Raj Kishore Prasad v. State of Bihar AIR 1996 SC 1931
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.