S. MURALIDHAR, C. R. DASH
Harekrushna Naik – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. S. Muralidhar, CJ. - This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 31st January 2004, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mayurbhanj in Sessions Case No.175 of 2000 convicting the Appellants for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 307, 452 and 341 read with Section 34 IPC. By the impugned order on sentence on the same date, the Appellants were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life for the offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC and no separate sentence was passed as regards the other offences.
2. While Appellant Nos. 2 and 4 were enlarged on bail by an order of this Court dated 12th November 2007, Appellant No.1 and Appellant No.3 were enlarged on bail by this Court by orders dated 15th February 2010 and 28th October 2015 respectively. The Court is informed subsequently by a report dated 21st January, 2021 of the Inspector in-Charge (IIC) of Raruan Police Station (PS) that Appellant No.3 has expired.
3. The case of the prosecution was that on 8th April 2000, at 8 am when the deceased Keshab Naik was sleeping in his house at village Sunaposi, PS-Raruan, District-Mayurbhanj, the Appellants i.e., accused numbers 1 to 4 dragged him to the villag
Abdul Sayeed v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Annareddy Sambasiva Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Balraje v. State of Maharashtra
Bonkya v. State of Maharashtra
Dinesh Kumar v. State of Rajasthan
Machhi Singh v. State of Punjab
Malkhan Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Mohar v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Ramlagan Singh v. State of Bihar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.