Back
V. NARASINGH
Ramu Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
JUDGMENT
V. Narasingh, J. - Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2. The Petitioner is an accused in Special (NDPS) Case No.20 of 2022 pending on the file of learned Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Kantamal, Boudh, arising out of Kantamal P.S. Case No.70 of 2022 for commission of offence under Sections 20(b)(ii)(c) of the N.D.P.S Act.
3. Being aggrieved by the rejection of his application for bail U/s. 439 Cr.P.C by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Kantamal by order dated 04.01.2023 in the aforementioned case, the present BLAPL has been filed.
4. Perused the order of rejection.
5. It is submitted by the learned counsel that the Petitioner is in custody since 03.06.2022 and the charge sheet has been filed on 29.11.2022.
6. It is further submitted that the co-accused has since been released on bail by order dated 09.12.2022 in BLAPL No.7003 of 2022. Hence, on the ground of parity, he seeks release.
7. Per contra, learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail relying on the bar contained in Section 37 of the N.D.P.S Act and also that since the Petitioner does not reside within the State, it would be difficult to ensure his
The court may consider the filing of the charge sheet and the release of co-accused as grounds for granting bail.
The right to a speedy trial under Article 21 supersedes statutory restrictions on bail under the NDPS Act, allowing for bail even in cases with prior criminal antecedents.
The court held that while the NDPS Act imposes strict bail conditions, the accused's right to a speedy trial under Article 21 may supersede these restrictions, allowing for bail under certain circums....
Prolonged incarceration affects the fundamental right to liberty, allowing bail to be granted despite statutory restrictions under the NDPS Act for first offenders.
In matters of personal liberty, meticulous adherence to procedural timelines should not compromise the accused's right to default bail, especially after the statutory period for charge sheet filing h....
Prolonged detention without trial violates Article 21 rights, warranting bail under specific conditions to ensure fairness while addressing state concerns on non-bailable offenses.
Bail under the N.D.P.S. Act requires the court to find reasonable grounds for believing the accused is not guilty and is not likely to commit further offenses while on bail.
The court considered the statement of the victim and the filing of the charge sheet as key factors in deciding to grant bail to the Petitioner.
The court may grant bail to accused persons based on the progress of investigation and their first-time offender status, with conditions to verify their criminal antecedents.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
