SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ori) 161

K. R. MOHAPATRA
Shakuntala Jena – Appellant
Versus
Sikhya O Anusandhan Private Limited, Bhubaneswar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Sudhansu Sekhar Jena, Advocate

JUDGMENT

 K.R. Mohapatra, J. - This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.

2. Order dated 13th October, 2022 (Annexure-2 series) passed in IA No.1 of 2022 (arising out of CS No.2319 of 2022) is under challenge in this CMP, whereby learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bhubaneswar rejected an application filed under Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC filed by the Petitioner.

3. It is submitted by Mr. Jena, learned counsel that the Petitioner has filed the suit for declaration of right, title, interest and permanent injunction. Along with the plaint, the Petitioner also filed an application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC in IA No.1 of 2022. Since the opposite parties created disturbance and tried to evict the Petitioner from the suit land forcibly, she filed an application under Order XXXIX rule 3 CPC to dispense with service of notice on the Opposite Parties and to take up IA No.1 of 2022 to pass an ex-parte ad interim order of injunction. However, during pendency of the suit, the Opposite Party No.3 and his henchmen forcibly evicted the Petitioner from the suit land. It is his submission that possession of the Plaintiff/Petitioner has been declared in a proceeding under Section 145 Cr.P.C.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top