SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ori) 142

ARINDAM SINHA
Subhakanta Pradhan – Appellant
Versus
Ashish Ishwar Patil, Collector, Kandhamal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Bhojaraj Seth, Advocate, A. K. Sharma, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Arindam Sinha, J. - Mr. Sharma, learned advocate, Additional Government Advocate appears on behalf of alleged contemner no.2 and submits, compliance affidavit dated 16th January, 2023 has been filed and copy served. He points out from order sheet recorded by Tahsildar, G. Udayagiri that by order dated 13th May, 2022, e-CAS/1434/2018 was disposed of. He submits, there was compliance thereby with direction in order dated 11th December, 2021, made by coordinate Bench disposing of applicant's writ petition. He tenders unqualified apology for delayed compliance.

2. Mr. Seth, learned advocate appears on behalf of applicant and submits, rule-10 in Odisha Miscellaneous Certificate Rules, 2019 provides for appeal and limitation of 30 days from date of the order. He submits, the information being basis of assertion that there has been compliance, was not supplied to his client.

3. On query from Court Mr. Sharma submits, there is no statement in the compliance affidavit regarding supply of copy of order dated 13th May, 2022 to applicant.

4. Contempt has been alleged, as committed by alleged contemner, for violation of direction in order dated 11th December, 2021. The order stands disclos

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top