SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ori) 225

SASHIKANTA MISHRA
Chhayakant Acharya – Appellant
Versus
Samitav Pani – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr.Suryakanta Dash, Advocate, for the Appellant.

JUDGMENT

Sashikanta Mishra, J.

The Petitioner is facing trial in I.C.C. No.303/2020 pending in the Court of learned J.M.F.C., Kendrapara instituted on the basis of a complaint filed by the present Opposite Party No.2 under Section 138 of the N.I. Act. In the present application filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., he seeks to challenge the order dated 9th February, 2023 passed by the Court below in allowing the application filed by the complainant to amend his complaint petition as well as his evidence affidavit.

2. The facts, relevant only to decide the present case are that the Opposite Party has filed the aforementioned complaint in the Court below claiming therein that the accused-Petitioner had taken a sum of Rs.6,60,000/- from him with assurance to return the same within 15 days. However, he did not repay the amount and after much persuasion he issued a cheque bearing No.018496 dated 16th October, 2020 amounting to Rs.7,20,000/-. The said cheque, when presented at the Bank was dishounoured on 19th October, 2020 on the ground of insufficient funds. The complainant therefore, issued a legal notice to the accused to pay the amount, but the same not having been paid, he filed the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top