K. R. MOHAPATRA
Debi Prasanna Pattanaik (Since Dead) – Appellant
Versus
Amulya Prasad Nayak – Respondent
JUDGMENT
K.R. Mohapatra, J.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Order dated 16th December, 2017 (Annexure-3) passed by learned 4th Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Cuttack in C.S. No.652 of 2013 is under challenge in this CMP, whereby an application filed by the Plaintiffs-Petitioners under Order VIII Rule 6-C CPC to exclude the counter-claim filed by the Defendant-Opposite Party, has been rejected.
3. Mr. Dey, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the suit has been filed for eviction of the Defendant-Opposite Party. On appearance, the Defendant filed his written statement along with the counter-claim seeking for partition of Schedule-A property claiming 1/3rd share in the same and to declare him as the adopted son of Bhajakrushna Pattanaik and Harapriya Pattanaik. The counter-claim was admitted on 13th April, 2017 by learned trial Court. Subsequently, the Plaintiffs filed an application under Order VIII Rule 6-C CPC to exclude the counter-claim. Vide order dated 16th December, 2017 (Annexure-3), learned trial Court dismissed such application. Hence, this CMP has been filed.
4. Mr. Dey, learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that the relief claimed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.