SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ori) 186

K. R. MOHAPATRA
Chinmaya Sahu – Appellant
Versus
Amit Kumar Sahu – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Chitta Ranjan Nanda, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Swarup Kumar Patnaik, Advocate, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

K.R. Mohapatra, J.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Judgment dated 11th May, 2023 (Annexure-4) passed by learned 1st Additional District & Sessions Judge, Baripada, Mayurbhanj in F.A.O. No.5 of 2023 is under challenge in this CMP, whereby dismissing the appeal, learned appellate Court confirmed the order dated 14th October, 2022 (Annexure-3) passed by learned Additional Senior Civil Judge, Baripada in C.M.A. No.10 of 2022 (arising out of C.S. No.535 of 2015) dismissing an application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC.

3. Mr. Nanda, learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that the Plaintiff-Opposite Party filed the suit for eviction, mandatory and prohibitory injunction. The Defendants- Petitioners though appeared in the suit through their learned Advocate, but did not file the written statement and contest the suit. Accordingly, they were set ex parte and subsequently, ex parte judgment was passed on 24th February, 2022. The Defendants-Petitioners could not know about the ex parte judgment passed against them, as learned Advocate appearing on their behalf did not intimate the same. When the Defendants- Petitioners came to know about the ex parte judgment passed i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top