SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ori) 88

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S.K. PANIGRAHI, J.
Babita Munda – Petitioner 
Versus
State of Odisha and Ors. - Respondents 
W.P.(C) No.9897 of 2014
Decided on : 06-09-2024
Advocates Appeared :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Gyanendra Ch. Swain, Adv.
For the Opposite Party : Mr. G.R.Mohapatra , ASC

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Gyanendra Ch. Swain, Adv.
For the Opposite Party : Mr. G.R.Mohapatra , ASC

The state is vicariously liable for custodial deaths due to negligence in ensuring safety and must compensate the victims' representatives for violations of fundamental rights.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 226 - Code of Criminal Procedure - Section 439 - Custodial death - Allegations of negligence by jail authorities leading to the suicide of a convict - The state is held vicariously liable for the death, as it is their duty to ensure the safety of inmates (Paras 6, 11-15).

(B) Compensation - The court awarded interim compensation pending the completion of investigations related to custodial death, outlining the necessity for the state to uphold the duty of care towards prisoners (Paras 16, 17).

Facts of the case:
The petition concerns the death of a prisoner in custody, who allegedly suffered physical and mental abuse, leading to his suicide while incarcerated. The petitioner claims negligence on part of jail authorities in ensuring the safety of the deceased (Paras 1-4).

Findings of Court:
The court found the state responsible for the custodial death and ordered the payment of interim compensation to the petitioner (Paras 16-19).

Issues: The court examined whether the circumstances surrounding the death of the prisoner indicated negligence by state authorities and the appropriate compensation for such failure (Paras 1, 5, 16).

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the state has a paramount duty to ensure the safety of prisoners, and if negligence is proven, compensation must be awarded under Articles 21 and 226 for violations of fundamental rights (Paras 11-15).

Result: Writ Petition allowed with directions for compensation (Para 20).

Table of Content
1. circumstances surrounding nandu munda's death (Para 1 , 2)
2. claims of negligence and mistreatment by jail authorities (Para 3 , 4)
3. duty of care and custody of prisoners (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. state liability for custodial deaths (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
5. interim compensation and directives issued (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)

JUDGMENT :

Dr. S.K. Panigrahi, J.

1. This Writ Petition has been filed concerning the unnatural death of a convicted prisoner, Nandia @ Nandu Munda. The Petition alleges that the prisoner endured both mental and physical torture at the hands of the jail authorities. It is claimed that this severe and unbearable mistreatment led him to take his own life. The petition asserts that the jail authorities are solely responsible for abetting his suicide through their conduct. Hence, the Petitioner seeks a direction of this Court to the State for awarding compensation to her for such death in custody.

I. FACTUAL MATRIX OF THE CASE

2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:

(i) Nandu Munda, the father of the Petitioner, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Keonjhar, in a Sessions Trial case and was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a term of 10 years, along with a monetary fine.

(ii) On 1.09.2010, approximately at 3:45 PM, Nandu Munda was discovered hanging by another convicted individual, Kedar Barik inside the latrine adjacent to the latrine of Ward No.14.

(iii) Warden Shyam Sundar Majhi, along with Kandara Munda, and Krushna Chandra Naik arrived at the scene and found Nandu Munda suspended by a towel tied around his neck from the skylight. The Warder lifted him, and Kandara Munda removed the towel and administered water to his mouth.

(iv) Subsequently, the incident was reported to the Assistant Jailor, who then informed the Jailor. Both officers promptly proceeded to the location, and the matter was reported to the Jail Medical Officer, who arrived at the scene, conducted a thorough examination, and ultimately referred NanduMunda to the District Head Quarter Hospital, Keonjhar for advanced treatment. Unfortunately, upon arrival at the hospital, he was pronounced dead by the attending Medical Officer.

(v) Following the death, an inquest report was prepared in the presence of the Petitioner’s family and the Executive Magistrate. A post- mortem examination was conducted at the District Head Quarter Hospital, Keonjhar. Upon completion of all legal formalities, the deceased’s body was released to the Petitioner’s family for burial. Since the death was in custody and the jail authority was in charge of his safety and security, they utterly failed to protect him, hence, the Petitioner seeks for compensation by filing the present Writ Petition.

II. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER:

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner earnestly made the following submissions in support of his contentions:

(vi) During the incarceration of the deceased, he suffered both physical and mental abuse at the hands of the jail authorities. The Petitioner was informed of this mistreatment by her father on multiple occasions during her visits. Despite bringing these issues to the attention of the Jail Superintendent, who assured an investigation, no such inquiry was conducted before the tragic and untimely death of Nandu Munda.

(vii) The Petitioner contends that, notwithstanding the official determination of suicide, the circumstances surrounding his death indicate culpable homicide due to the ongoing mistreatment by jail personnel.

(viii) Her father’s death is enveloped in a suspicious circumstance, casting serious doubts on the conclusion of suicide by the authorities.

(ix) The Petitioner further alleges that, in a bid to evade accountability, the jail authorities transferred the victim to the District Head Quarter Hospital, Keonjhar at the last moment, where he died under questionable and doubtful circumstances.

(x) The Opposite Parties are accused of fabricating a false narrative to avoid legal repercussio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top