Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ARINDAM SINHA, M.S. SAHOO
Sunita Senapati – Appellant
Versus
Bismaya Mohapatra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. issue of notification to absent parties. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. evidence concerning returned articles. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. comparison with previous case law. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. finality of legal proceedings and procedural fairness. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. confirmation of the family court’s decision. (Para 9 , 10) |
JUDGMENT :
ARINDAM SINHA, J.
1. Mr. Jena, learned advoc ate appears on behalf of appellant, wife in the marriage annulled by ex-parte judgment dated 7th April, 2023 made by the Family Court. He had earlier submitted, the appeal is directed against order dated 16th January, 2024 of the Family Court, refusing to admit the application for setting aside the ex parte judgment. Though, his client was precluded from filing written statement, it cannot stand in the way of relief under rule 13 in order IX, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. On subsequent occasion he had submitted that not only was his client precluded from filing written statement but also, when learned advocate engaged by her had failed to appear, the Family Court ought to have issued notice to his client. He had relied on judgment dated 2nd December, 1997 of the Supreme Court in Malkiat Singh v. Joginder Singh , reported in A
Legal proceedings require parties to ensure their representation; negligence in appearance does not obligate courts to issue new notices.
Valid service of notice is mandatory for ensuring a fair trial. Failure to secure appearance through appropriate procedures constitutes a miscarriage of justice.
The court emphasized the necessity of proper service of notice in family law proceedings to uphold the right to a fair hearing, determining that procedural missteps can lead to serious miscarriages o....
The court allows remand of a matrimonial case for the appellant to contest after an ex parte decree, prioritizing substantive justice over technicalities.
A Family Court must adhere to procedural rules before declaring a litigant ex parte, ensuring proper notice and opportunity for mediation.
Exparte decree – Setting aside – Every conclusion must be well supported by adequate reasons and if issue is arising that case has not been properly dealt with, same would be relevant circumstance fo....
The court established that legal representatives of a defendant who has been proceeded against ex parte should have the opportunity to contest the matter, and limitation for setting aside such decree....
An ex parte divorce decree is invalid if the court fails to ensure the necessary party's appearance, violating principles of natural justice.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
