THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SIBO SANKAR MISHRA, J.
Bhima Swain and another - Appellants
Versus
State of Orissa - Respondent
CRA No. 120 of 1997
Decided On : 09-12-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and convictions. (Para 1) |
| 2. detailed account of incident and prosecution evidence. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. defense arguments and claims of false implication. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. support from medical evidence and eyewitness accounts. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. analysis and findings of the trial court. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. final sentence modification and conclusion. (Para 15 , 16 , 18) |
JUDGMENT :
SIBO SANKAR MISHRA, J.
The appellants in the present appeal have assailed the judgment and order dated 02.05.1997 passed by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Ganjam-Gajapati, Berhampur in Sessions Case No. 354 of 1996, whereby the accused appellant, namely, Bhagaban Swain was convicted U/s.325 of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to undergo R.I. for a period of 2 (two) years and pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- I.D. to undergo R.I. for 6 (six) months and the accused appellant, namely, Bhima Swain was convicted U/s.323 of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to undergo R.I. for a period of 6 (six) months.
2. This appeal is pending since 1997. When the matter was taken up for hearing, consistently in many dates of hearing, nobody appeared for the appellants. Therefore, on 05.01.2024, Mr. Sougat Dash, who was present in Court, was entrusted to conduct this case, as Amicus Curiae.
3. Heard Mr. Sougat Dash, learned Amicus Curiae for the appellants and Mr. Raj Bhusan Dash, learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State.
4. The prosecution case may be briefly stated as follows. In village Khajapalli, there exists a tank known as “Bada Bandha”. On 10.05.1994 at about 6:00 P.M., one Kesab Swain, along with Bhagaban Swain, Kamaraju Bisoi, Lochan Swain (son of Kesab), and others, were bathing in the said tank. During this time, some water splashed by Lochan accidentally fell on accused Bhagaban Swain, who took strong exception to it, leading to an exchange of heated words and a brief scuffle. The situation was, however, pacified due to the intervention of Kesab Swain and Kamaraju Bisoi.
Shortly thereafter, one Gantei Dakua arrived at the tank to bathe. At that moment, accused Bhagaban Swain allegedly snatched Gantei’s Asha Badi (thenga) and struck a blow on the head of Lochan Swain. Accused Bahadur Swain is stated to have assaulted Kesab Swain with three blows of a thenga on his head. When Kesab fell to the ground, accused Bhima Swain allegedly joined the assault and dealt further blows to Kesab and Lochan. After the assault, accused Bhagaban, Bhima, and Bahadur Swain left the spot carrying their respective thengas.
The injured Kesab Swain and Lochan Swain were immediately carried home by Kamaraju Bisoi, Jaya Swain, and Indra Bisoi, and thereafter shifted to Polsara P.H.C. for treatment. Unfortunately, Kesab was declared dead by the attending doctor.
Upon receiving information regarding the admission of injured persons at Polsara P.H.C., the O.I.C., Kabisuryanagar Police Station (P.W.17), arrived at the hospital. At about 10:30 P.M., Kamaraju Bisoi orally reported the incident to him, which was reduced into writing and treated as the F.I.R. The same was forwarded to the Police Station for formal registration of the case. On that very night, the Investigating Officer examined the informant and other witnesses at the P.H.C.
On 11.05.1994, the Investigating Officer visited the place of occurrence, examined additional witnesses, and conducted inquest over the dead body of Kesab Swain at about 8:30 A.M. in presence of witnesses. The inquest report was marked as Ext.14. He seized one bamboo lathi (asha badi thenga, M.O.IV) produced by Gantei Dakua under seizure list Ext.20. Sample earth and blood-stained earth were seized from the spot under Ext.15. He further seized bamboo lathis thenga (M.Os. V, VI, VII) from the houses of accused Bahadur, Bhagaban, and Bhima Swain respectively, under seizure lists Exts.17 to 19.
The dead body of Kesab Swain was sent for post-mortem examination to the Medical Officer, Purusottampur Government Ho
AI
Conviction under IPC sections 325 and 323 upheld due to consistent ocular and medical evidence, emphasizing the necessity for robust proof of participation in the crime.
Convictions under IPC affirmed based on corroborated eyewitness testimony; A3 acquitted due to lack of evidence and identification.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the significance of consistent witness statements and the requirement for the prosecution to explain injuries sustained by the accused.
Court emphasized that personal vendetta not motivated by caste does not support charges under SC & ST Act; conviction modified from grievous to simple injury under IPC based on nature of the injuries....
Appellate courts can modify sentences based on rehabilitation of the offender and time elapsed since the crime while ensuring the conviction is supported by credible evidence.
The incident constituted sudden provocation without premeditation, justifying a conviction under Section 304 IPC and allowing for a sentence modification based on mitigating factors.
The intention to kill under Section 307 IPC can be inferred from the nature of the attack and weapon used, even if the resulting injuries are not grievous.
The conviction under Section 324 IPC was modified to Section 323 IPC due to insufficient evidence of grievous harm, emphasizing the need for credible witness testimony and the burden of proof on the ....
The court affirmed the conviction for attempt to murder but granted probation instead of imprisonment due to the appellant's age and subsequent conduct, emphasizing rehabilitation over punishment.
The prosecution's failure to explain injuries on the accused undermined the credibility of its case, resulting in the acquittal of the appellants under the benefit of doubt.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.