SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 324

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
R.K.PATTANAIK
Maheshwar Jena – Appellant
Versus
Madhusudan Dalai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : A.S. Nandy
For the Respondents: P.K. Rath, S.K. Swain

Table of Content
1. finality of court's decision and dismissal of petitions. (Para 1 , 21 , 22)
2. challenging election disqualification under odisha law. (Para 2 , 3)
3. election petition details and court responses. (Para 4 , 5)
4. summary of parties' arguments and court's role. (Para 6 , 7)
5. importance of evidence verification in disqualification. (Para 10 , 11)
6. legal standards for 'reading and writing' in odia. (Para 12 , 14 , 15 , 16)
7. responsibilities of a sarpanch and implications of disqualification. (Para 19 , 20)

JUDGMENT :

1. Both the writ petitions are disposed of by the following judgment since a common cause of action is involved.

This writ petition is filed by the petitioner challenging the impugned judgment dated 20th April, 2024 as at Annexure-1 passed in connection with Election Misc. Case No.03 of 2022 by the learned Civil Judge, Balasore confirmed in Election Appeal No.03 of 2024, whereby, he has been declared to be disqualified under Section 11 of the Odisha Grama Panchayats Act, 1964 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) in connection with the election to the seat of Sarpanch, Bishnupur Gram Panchayat on the grounds inter alia that such decision is erroneous and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top