SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 454

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
A.C. BEHERA
Damayanti Tarei – Appellant
Versus
Kailash Tarei – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : D. Sahoo
For the Respondent: S.K. Mohanty

Table of Content
1. overview of petition process and facts (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. challenge to the court's earlier order (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. procedural requirements for partition (Para 8 , 9)
4. defendants' grounds for challenge (Para 10 , 11)
5. court's validation of commissioner's report (Para 12 , 13)
6. final dismissal of the petition (Para 14)

JUDGMENT :

1. This Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioners against the Opposite Parties praying for quashing (setting aside) an order dated 07.01.2019 (Annexure-1) passed in C.S.No.43 of 2013 (F.D.) by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Balasore.

3. The factual backgrounds of this Civil Miscellaneous Petition, which prompted the petitioners/defendants for filing of the same is that, after the preliminary decree passed in the suit for partition vide C.S. No.43 of 2013, final decree proceeding thereof under Order-20, Rule-18 of the C.P.C. 1908 was started.

(i) an excess area of 900 sq. links (those are not in possession of the parties) have been illegally allotted in favour of the plaintiffs.

The plaintiffs objected to the said petition dated 30.07.2018 of the defendants statin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top