SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 534

ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA
Srusti Prava Das – Appellant
Versus
Basanta Kumar Dash – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. U.K. Samal, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. A. Tripathy, Advocate.

Table of Content
1. petition for revision under cpc filed. (Para 1 , 2)
2. trial court's rejection of plaint based on res judicata. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court’s considerations on earlier suit and evidence. (Para 5 , 6)
4. grounds for rejection can only be decided with evidence. (Para 7)
5. revision dismissed, liberty given to raise issues. (Para 8 , 9)

JUDGMENT :

1. This Revision under Section 115 of the CPC, 1908 has been filed by the petitioner (defendant No.2 in the suit vide C.S. No.209 of 2020) against the plaintiffs in the suit vide C.S. No.209 of 2020 arraying them (plaintiffs) as Opp. Party Nos.1 and 2 and also arraying the defendant No.1 and 3 to 9 as proforma Opp. Parties praying for setting aside the impugned order of rejection to his petition under Order 7, Rule 11 read with Section 151 of the CPC, 1908 passed on dated 31.01.2022 in the suit vide C.S. No.209 of 2020 by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Odagaon.

The defendant No.2 (petitioner in this revision) filed a petition on dated 03.02.2021 under Order 7, Rule 11 read with Section 151 of the CPC, 1908 in that suit vide C.S. No.209 of 2020 praying for rejection of the plaint of the plaintiffs (Opp. Party Nos.1 and 2) on the gr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top