Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SASHIKANTA MISHRA
Savitri Devi (Dead) – Appellant
Versus
Srikrushna Academy – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff’s appeal against a dismissal of suit. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. plaintiff's claim of title via auction; defendants contest ownership. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. framed issues for determination in trial court. (Para 6) |
| 4. trial court's findings on possession and non-joinder. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. substantial questions of law framed for appeal. (Para 9) |
| 6. arguments regarding notice under section 80 of cpc. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 7. admissibility of evidence regarding notice. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 8. plaintiff's title central to claims; notice requirements discussed. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 9. court’s view on mandatory notice and waiver of defect. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 10. concluding whether suit was barred by limitation. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 11. conclusion: appeal allowed and suit decreed. (Para 25 , 26) |
JUDGMENT :
1. This is a plaintiff’s appeal against a confirming judgment. The suit filed by the plaintiff for declaration of his title and for correction of ROR being dismissed by the trial Court was confirmed in appeal.
3. The plaintiff’s case is that the suit land originally stood recorded in the name of Sk. Taju Mohammad, Sk. Jabar Mohammad, Sk. Manan Mohammad, Sk. Safiti Mohammad and Sk. Baboo Moh
A suit for correction of record pursuant to established title can proceed beyond limitation, with notice requirements under Section 80 CPC deemed unnecessary if no specific relief against public offi....
Procedural irregularities in land settlement undermine title claims; civil courts can intervene if statutory processes lack compliance.
Civil Court can review procedural irregularities in tenure matters unless barred by specific statutory provisions, impacting tenant rights and land ownership claims.
The requirement for notice under Section 80 CPC is waived when leave to file without notice is granted; non-joinder of parties does not invalidate a suit concerning adverse possession.
Settlement record of rights does not extinguish prior title, and collusive judgments lack binding authority on necessary parties.
A suit for declaration of title is maintainable even if there are erroneous entries in settlement records, as such entries do not create or extinguish title. The civil court has the authority to dete....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
