Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Niranjan Behera – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. employment history leading to petition. (Para 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments for regularization of contractual employment. (Para 4) |
| 3. court's validation of petitioner's claim. (Para 7) |
| 4. final order for regularization. (Para 8) |
Judgment :
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy, J.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. Heard Mr. S.B. Jena, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. M.R. Mohanty, learned Addl. Govt. Advocate appearing for the Opp. Parties.
3. The present writ petition has been filed inter alia challenging order dtd.25.03.2022 so passed by Opp. Party No. 1 under Annexure-24. Claim of the Petitioner to get the benefit of regularization being a contractual employee w.e.f.26.06.2007 was rejected on the ground that Petitioner was so appointed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Haridaspur-Paradeep Rail Link-Opp. Party No. 4, without following due procedure of law.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner contended that pursuant to the letter issued by Opp. Party No. 4 on 02.03.2006 under Annexure-1 and consequential letter issued by the Commerce & Transport Department, Govt. of Odisha on 27.05.2006 under Annexure-2, Opp. Party No. 4 vide his let
The regularization of long-serving contractual employees is mandated when their roles are inherently permanent, ensuring compliance with employment laws and protections against exploitation.
Regularization of employees must consider equitable treatment and the rights of long-serving individuals, given principles of fairness under the Constitution.
The State's arbitrary rejection of a long-term temporary employee's regularization claim violates constitutional rights and obligations, emphasizing the need for fair employment practices under Artic....
The court emphasized the importance of regularizing long-serving temporary employees to ensure compliance with fairness principles and constitutional protections in employment.
The court reaffirmed that long-standing temporary employees, performing essential duties, must be regularized, rejecting claims of irregularity based solely on appointment processes without addressin....
Long-term temporary employment in a sanctioned post qualifies employees for regularization when no lawful recruitment process is conducted, affirming their rights and job security.
Government entities must regularize long-term contractual employees in essential roles, upholding constitutional employment rights against arbitrary terminations.
The court affirmed the obligations of the State to regularize long-serving employees in essential roles, emphasizing fair employment practices and adherence to constitutional provisions.
The State must uphold fair employment practices, ensuring that longstanding contractual employees receive regularization if their roles are recurring and essential to the organization.
The court emphasized that rights to regularization must not be undermined by interim orders, as continuous service in a permanent role bears entitlement to regularization under fair labor practices.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
