SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 853

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Hemanta Kumar Bhoi – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : B.K. Pattanaik
For the Respondent: C.K. Pradhan

Table of Content
1. dismissal due to conviction and subsequent acquittal. (Para 3 , 4)
2. arguments against reinstatement based on perceived nature of acquittal. (Para 5 , 6)
3. court's position on entitlement to reinstatement after acquittal. (Para 7)
4. court quashes dismissal order and mandates reinstatement. (Para 8)

JUDGMENT :

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.

3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia challenging order passed on 30.06.2015 under Annexure-5 and further order passed on 22.04.2024 under Annexure-9 as well as order dtd.28.08.2024 under Annexure-12.

4.1. It is however contended that challenging such order of conviction and sentence, Petitioner approached this Court by filing Criminal Appeal No.318 of 2015. This Court vide judgment dtd.19.10.2023 under Annexure-6, while allowing the appeal set aside the order of conviction and sentence passed on 29.05.2015.

4.3. It is contended that this Court in its order under Annexure-11, directed the Appellate Authority to take into consideration of the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Ram Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. /b>. (Civil Appeal No.7935 of 2023). Ho

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top