SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 870

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
Lipika Nayak – Appellant
Versus
Ajitav Nayak – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. A. Tripathy, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. S.P. Dash, Adv.

Table of Content
1. writ petition initiated for compliance of maintenance order. (Para 1 , 6 , 7)
2. arguments presented regarding the compliance of maintenance and filing of written statement. (Para 4 , 5)
3. legal principles surrounding maintenance compliance and proceeding dismissal. (Para 8 , 10 , 18)
4. enforcement of maintenance orders and court's authority. (Para 11 , 15 , 16 , 17)
5. court's final order regarding execution and filing process. (Para 19 , 20 , 21)

Judgment :

1. The present Writ Petition has been preferred by the Petitioner-wife, who is the Respondent in C.P. No.04/46 of 2020/2018, which is now pending in the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Nayagarh. A prayer has been made by the Petitioner-wife to set aside the order dated 21.04.2023 passed by the learned Court below in the aforesaid C.P. and allow the Petitioner to file her Written Statement only after getting the maintenance and litigation expenses in terms of the order dated 28.10.2022 passed in I.A. No.01/2020-22/2018, arising out of C.P. No.04/46 of 2020/2018 .

3. Heard Mr. Tripathy, learned Counsel for the Petitioner-wife so also Mr. Dash, learned Counsel for the Opposite Party-husband.

4.1 Mr. Tripathy fu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top