Back
ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA
Digambar Behera (dead) – Appellant
Versus
Harichandan Behera (dead) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.
1. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the Petitioners praying for quashing the impugned order dated 10.05.2022 (Annexure-4) passed under Section 15(b) of the OSS Act, 1958 by the Member, Board of Revenue, Odisha, Cuttack (O.P.No.8).
2. Heard from the learned counsel for the Petitioners, the learned counsel for the O.P. Nos.1 to 7 and the learned ASC for the O.P. Nos.8 and 9.
3. During the course of hearing, the learned counsel for the Petitioners submitted that, the case land vide Hal Plot No.897 corresponds to Sabik Plot No.726/1639 under Sabik Khata No.345. The Hal R.o.R. of the case land has been prepared erroneously in the name of the O.P. Nos.1 to 7, though, the same corresponds to Sabik Khata No.345 and the Sabik Khata No.345 was recorded in the name of the predecessor of the Petitioners. For which, they (petitioners) are the owners of the case land. The O.P. Nos.1 to 7 are not the owners of the same. The learned counsel for the Petitioners also fairly submitted that, the Hal Plot No.897 under Hal Khata No.1013, Ac.0.144 decimals (which is not the case land) has been recorded erro
Land ownership disputes must consider all relevant plots for proper adjudication.
Settlement authorities' orders do not confer or extinguish title to property; parties retain the right to establish ownership through legal proceedings.
Allegations of fraud in correction of public records must be specifically pleaded and substantiated, and procedural errors in addressing delay can render judicial decisions unsustainable.
Settlement authorities cannot alter confirmed land assignments without legal basis, emphasizing the need to respect prior land grants and judicial confirmations.
An order correcting the Record of Rights is unsustainable if made beyond the limitation period without appropriate condonation or credible allegations of fraud being substantiated.
The non-production of lease records by authorities cannot preclude rights of possession established through long-term lease agreements.
Settlement authorities lack jurisdiction to declare a sale deed void; unchallenged orders remain valid until modified by a competent authority.
The classification of land as non-transferable was overturned when evidence indicated it was transferable under sthitiban status, reaffirming the necessity to review administrative classifications.
The principle of res judicata prevents re-litigation of previously settled land ownership disputes, especially against procedural lapses, reaffirming established ownership under the Orissa Estates Ab....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
