SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 986

ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA
Jhansi Rani Bosi – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. S.K.Dalai,Advocate.
For the Respondent: Ms. J.Sahoo, A.S.C.

Table of Content
1. challenging the mutation officer's order regarding land mutation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. dispute over possession and authority regarding mutation proceedings. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. procedural aspects of mutation versus ownership rights. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. jurisdictional limits of mutation authorities over sale deeds. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
5. final ruling on the invalidity of impugned orders and allowance of the writ petition. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)

JUDGMENT :

1. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of the India, 1950 has been filed by the Petitioners against the Opposite Parties praying for quashing (setting aside) the order dated 27.08.2024 passed in Misc. Case No.23 of 2024 by the Mutation Officer-cum-Tahasildar, Kashinagar (O.P. No.6).

After, execution and registration of the sale deed No.10552400468 dated 16.02.2024 by the Petitioner No.1 in favour of the Petitioner Nos.2 to 5 in respect of the case land, mutation cases vide Mutation case Nos.277 of 2024 and 278 of 2024 were initiated before the Mutation Officer-cum-Tahasildar, Kashinagar (O.P. No.6) for recording the case land in the name of the purchasers thereof i.e. Petiti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top