SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ori) 121

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
G.SATAPATHY
Swapnil Goraksh Dhokale – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : P.K. Nanda, S. Mishra
For the Respondent: M.R. Patra

Table of Content
1. bail applications connected to same case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments presented by the parties. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's reasoning on bail applications. (Para 6)
4. conclusion and orders on bail decisions. (Para 7 , 8)

JUDGMENT :

1. Since these three bail applications arise out of one and same case record, the same are heard together and disposed of by this common order with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties.

3. Facts in precise are that the complainant Dr. Saswata Mohanty was contacted by a woman on 2nd October, 2024 by introducing herself as a Staff-cum- Assistant of “Geoji Financial Services Ltd”. Accordingly, she added the complainant to a Whatsapp Group named “F2-Geoji Financial Services Ltd”. which is stated to be engaged in share trading at discounted rates with promise of daily dividends with high profit margins and accordingly, impression was given to the complainant that the said Whatsapp Group was engaged in block trading, IPO investments & other profitable financial features. Based on these representations, the complainant made the first investment of INR 50,000/- to the Bank account details provided by an alleged customer service represen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top