SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ori) 147

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
B.P.ROUTRAY
Pabitra Naik – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. P.K.Mishra, Advocate
For the Respondent: Ms. P.Nayak, CGC

Table of Content
1. the court heard arguments from both parties. (Para 1 , 2)
2. tribunal’s direction on interest calculation. (Para 3)
3. interest on compensation starts from the date of the accident. (Para 4 , 5)
4. court’s opinion on unreasonable fixed deposit requirement. (Para 6)
5. final order on disbursement of compensation. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. Mishra, learned counsel for the claimant – Appellant and Ms. Nayak, learned CGC for Union of India.

3. It is submitted on behalf of the Petitioner that the Tribunal while granting interest at Para-17 of the impugned judgment has directed for payment of interest from the date of appearance of the Applicant’s Evidence (AE) i.e. 19th June 2026 till the date of actual payment.

18. The learned Amicus has referred to judgments of this Court in Raman Iron Foundry [Union of India v. Raman Iron Foundry, (1974) 2 SCC 231, para 11] and Kesoram Industries [Kesoram Industries and Cotton Mills Ltd. v. CWT, (1966) 2 SCR 688, para 33 : AIR 1966 SC 1370] to submit that quantum of compensation applicable is to be as on the award of the Tribunal as the amount due is only on that day and not earlier. In Kesoram Industries [Kesoram Industries and Cot

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top